Whereas many people are familiar with famous territorial disputes, be it Taiwan, Kosovo, or Crimea, there exists one battle which has eluded popular awareness. This is largely due to the nature of the participants involved.
Canada and Denmark are known for their peaceful and democratic nature; one does not think of them as nations prone to sabre-rattling. Despite this, Canada and Denmark have been engaged in a territorial dispute for almost a century. At the centre of this dispute is a tiny outcropping known as Hans Island.
The dispute over Hans Island is very real, having soured Danish-Canadian relations for decades and remains unresolved to this day. This war of words (and whiskey) over control of a tiny portion of the vast High Arctic, remains a key point in bilateral relations. From ministerial and military visits, to international science teams, Hans Island has enjoyed a storied and coveted existence in an otherwise forgotten corner of the world.
With Danish control over Greenland established in 1815, Denmark has long had a significant presence in the High Arctic region. Following the purchase of Alaska by the United States, and the formation of Canada in 1867, British and American interest in the region increased. Anglo-American efforts to explore and chart the region often relied on Inuit and Danish peoples in Greenland. Indeed Hans Island is named after Hans Hendirk, a Greenlandic explorer working for Anglo-American expeditions from 1853-1876.
Canadian sovereignty in the High Arctic came abruptly in 1880, when Britain transferred the British Arctic Territory (based on the claims of 16th century explorer Martin Frobisher) to Canada. This was undertaken in order to prevent American claims based on the Monroe Doctrine (no European ownership in North America) to the region. Given imperfect mapping techniques and the difficulties inherent in Arctic exploration, Hans Island was not explicitly included in this transfer.
In the 1920s, Danish explorers were finally able to accurately map Hans Island. The island is a mere 1.3sq km, uninhabited, devoid of trees and with barely any soil. It is so remote that the closest inhabited location is Alert, Nunavut, 198km to the north. Indeed, very little distinguishes Hans Island from the thousands of other barren islands in the area. Consequently, one rightly wonders what all the commotion is about.
The reason that Hans Island has become a flash-point in international relations, is that it is located in a spot where geography and international law collide. Specifically, Hans Island is located in the middle of the 35 km wide Nares Strait, which separates Nunavut from Greenland. Under international law, states have control over territorial waters which extend 12 miles (22.2km) from shore. Consequently, Hans Island falls within both the Danish and Canadian 12 mile zone, with both claiming the island as a result.
Dispute Escalates in 20th Century
In the wake of the Danish mapping of the island, as well as pressure from Copenhagen; the status of Hans Island was brought to the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), which ruled in favour of Denmark in 1933. However, given the remoteness of the island and the disintegration of the League of Nations (of which the PCIJ was the judicial organ) in the 1930s, this ruling did not resolve matters. Furthermore, following WWII both the League of Nations and PCIJ were abolished and superseded by the UN and International Court of Justice respectively. Consequently, the now eighty year old ruling of a defunct court has little power.
Following the 1930s, Hans Island faded into obscurity for several decades as both Canada and Denmark attended to more pressing concerns. Later, the island once again fell through the cracks of international law in the early 1970s. In 1972-1973, Canada and Denmark agreed on the demarcation of maritime borders in the Arctic. Both countries recognized each others' claims extending out from the continental shelf, making the agreement the largest of its kind in history. Despite the scope of the negotiations, the status Hans Island remains unresolved. The maritime border immediately north and south of the island were established, but not the island itself.
New Millennium, Same Dispute
Relations were further strained when, on July 13th 2005, Canadian forces landed on the island, erecting an Inukshuk and Canadian flag. The following week, Canadian Defence Minister Bill Graham landed on the island. This led Denmark to file a complaint stating that “we consider Hans Island to be part of Danish territory, and will therefore hand over a complaint about the Canadian minister's unannounced visit.”
Fortunately, despite the strong rhetoric, both sides maintain a sense of humour on the issue. As successive Danish and Canadian landings on the island erect and dismantle flag poles and markers, they leave presents for the next contingent. This 'whiskey war' was initiated in 1984, when the Danish minister for Greenland landed on the island leaving a bottle of schnapps and a sign proclaiming “Welcome to the Danish Island.”
Peter Takso Jensen, head of international law department of the Danish Foreign Ministry, noted that “when Danish military go there, they leave a bottle of schnapps. And when Canadian military forces come there, they leave a bottle of Canadian Club and a sign saying 'Welcome to Canada'”
The Common Russian Concern
On May 27th 2014, Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird and Danish counterpart, Martin Lidegaard met to discuss the Hans Island issue, as relations improved during 2014. In recent years, both Canada and Denmark's Arctic focus has shifted away from Hans Island to Russia's increased activity in the region. Russia's Arctic presence far exceeds both Canada and Denmark, with Moscow operating many ships designed to operate in the High Arctic, including a fleet of nuclear powered icebreakers. Russia has also increased its Arctic military flights near both Canadian and Danish airspace.
Both Denmark and Canada are part of NATO, so the likelihood of violence erupting over Hans Island is negligible. What concerns both countries, is a pro-active and assertive Russia in Arctic seeking to capitalize on oil and fishing rights. This common threat, has the potential to bolster bilateral ties between Canada and Denmark, and expedite a resolution, in order to get both nations on the same page before Russian Arctic questions need answering.